4.6 Review

Review and refinement of an existing qualitative risk assessment method for application within an ecosystem-based management framework

Journal

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 72, Issue 3, Pages 1043-1056

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsu142

Keywords

consequence; ecosystem approach; fisheries; likelihood; qualitative assessments; risk analysis; risk assessment; risk management; stock assessment; weight of evidence

Funding

  1. Department of Fisheries in Western Australian
  2. Fisheries Research and Development Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The adoption of risk-based methodologies is considered essential for the successful implementation of an ecosystem approach to fisheries and broader aquatic management. To assist with these initiatives, one of the qualitative risk assessment methods adapted for fisheries management over a decade ago has been reviewed. This method was updated to ensure compliance with the revised international standards for risk management (ISO 31000) and to enable consideration of ecological, economic, social, and governance risks. The review also addressed the difficulties that have been encountered in stakeholder understanding of the underlying concepts and to increase the discipline in its application. The updates include simplifying the number of consequence and likelihood levels, adopting graphical techniques to represent different consequence levels, and discussing how changes in uncertainty can affect risk scores. Adopting an explicit weight of evidence approach has also assisted with determining which consequence scenarios are considered plausible and, where relevant, their specific likelihoods. The revised methods therefore incorporate the conceptual elements from a number of qualitative and quantitative approaches increasing their reliability and enabling a more seamless transition along this spectrum as more lines of evidence are collected. It is expected that with continued application of these methods, further refinements will be identified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available