4.6 Article

Acoustic surveys confirm the high-density areas of harbour porpoises found by satellite tracking

Journal

ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages 929-936

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsr025

Keywords

cetacean; conservation; detection rate; Habitat Directive; kernel home range; monitoring; MPA; Phocoena phocoena; SAC

Funding

  1. Danish Forest and Nature Agency [SN 343/SN-0008]
  2. Animal Welfare Division (Ministry of Justice) [1995-101-62]
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [smru10001] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The population status of the harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) has long been of concern in European waters. Consequently, the European Commission (EC) Habitats Directive obligates all EC member states to designate marine protected areas (MPAs) for harbour porpoises before 2012. These will be designated areas having the greatest density of porpoises. However, little is known about comparability between the monitoring methods used to examine porpoise distribution and density, and conflicting results may arise, especially when considering their varying sample size and temporal and spatial scales. Here, vessel-based acoustic surveys are seen as an independent method of testing the temporal and spatial permanence of previously identified areas of high density of harbour porpoises found by satellite-tracking them in inner Danish waters. Based on six acoustic surveys, a strong spatial accord was found between the number of acoustic detections of harbour porpoises and their density distribution obtained from 10 years of satellite tracking. The results confirm the presence and permanence of areas of high density of porpoises and validate the two methods for identifying and monitoring future MPAs for the species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available