4.5 Article

A visible and near-infrared photometric correction for Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M3)

Journal

ICARUS
Volume 222, Issue 1, Pages 229-242

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.10.036

Keywords

Moon; Moon, Surface; Photometry; Spectrophotometry

Funding

  1. NASA Discovery program
  2. NASA [NNM05AB26C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Observations of the Moon obtained by the Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M-3) instrument were acquired at various local viewing geometries. To compensate for this, a visible near-infrared photometric correction for the M-3 observations of the lunar surface has been derived. Images are corrected to the standard geometry of 30 degrees phase angle with an incidence of 30 degrees and an emission of 0 degrees. The photometric correction is optimized for highland materials but is also a good approximation for mare deposits. The results are compared with ground-based observations of the lunar surface to validate the absolute reflectance of the M-3 observations. This photometric model has been used to produce the v1.0 Level 2 delivery of the entire set of M-3 data to the Planetary Data System (PDS). The photometric correction uses local topography, in this case derived from an early version of the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter data, to more accurately determine viewing geometry. As desired, this photometric correction removes most of the topography of the M-3 measurements. In this paper, two additional improvements of the photometric modeling are discussed: (1) an extrapolated phase function long ward of 2500 nm to avoid possible misinterpretation of spectra in the wavelength region that includes possible OH/H2O absorptions and (2) an empirical correction to remove a residual cross-track gradient in the data that likely is an uncorrected instrumental effect. New files for these two effects have been delivered to PDS and can be applied to the M-3 observations. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available