4.5 Article

Venus nitric oxide nightglow mapping from SPICAV nadir observations

Journal

ICARUS
Volume 226, Issue 1, Pages 428-436

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2013.05.031

Keywords

Ultraviolet observations; Venus; Venus, atmosphere; Atmospheres, Dynamics; Atmospheres, Structure

Funding

  1. PRODEX program of the European Space Agency (ESA)
  2. CNRS
  3. CNES
  4. ESA/PRODEX-BELSPO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitric oxide (190-240 nm) and gamma (255-270 nm) bands have been observed on the Venus nightside with Venus Express SPICAV instrument operated in the nadir mode. These ultraviolet emissions arise from the de-excitation of NO molecules created by radiative recombination of O(P-3) and N(S-4) atoms. These atoms are produced on the dayside of the planet through photodissociation of CO2 and N-2 molecules and are transported to the nightside by the global subsolar to antisolar circulation. We analyze a wide dataset of nadir observations obtained since 2006 to determine the statistical distribution of the NO nightglow and its variability. Individual observations show a great deal of variability and may exhibit multiple maxima along latitudinal cuts. We construct and compare a global NO map with the results obtained during the Pioneer-Venus mission and with the recently observed O-2(a(1)Delta(g)) nightglow distribution. The NO airglow distribution shows a statistical bright region extending from 01:00 to 03:30 local time and 25 degrees S to 10 degrees N, very similar to the Pioneer results obtained 35 years earlier during maximum solar activity conditions. The shift from the antisolar point and the difference with the O-2 airglow indicate that superrotating zonal winds are statistically weak near 97 km, but play an important role near 115 km. We compare these results with other evidence for superrotation in the thermosphere and point out possible sources of momentum transfer. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available