4.5 Article

Sources and losses of energetic protons in Saturn's magnetosphere

Journal

ICARUS
Volume 197, Issue 2, Pages 519-525

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2008.05.011

Keywords

Saturn, magnetosphere; Saturn, satellites; Saturn, rings; satellites, surfaces

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council, UK
  2. NASA
  3. JHU/APL
  4. NASA jet Propulsion Laboratory [1243218]
  5. Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio
  6. STFC [PP/D005213/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/D005213/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present Cassini data revealing that protons between a few keV and about 100 keV energy are not stably trapped in Saturn's inner magnetosphere. Instead these ions are present only for relatively short times following injections. Injected Protons are lost principally because the neutral gas cloud converts these particles to energetic neutral atoms via charge exchange. At higher energies, in the MeV to GeV range, protons are stably trapped between the orbits of the principal moons because the proton cross-section for charge exchange is very small at such energies. These protons likely result from cosmic ray albedo neutron decay (CRAND) and are lost principally to interactions with satellite surfaces and ring particles during magnetospheric radial diffusion. A main result of this work is to show that the dominant energetic proton loss and source processes are a function of proton energy. Surface sputtering by keV ions is revisited based on the reduced ion intensities observed. Relatively speaking, MeV ion and electron weathering is most important closer to Saturn, e.g. at Janus and Mimas, whereas keV ion weathering is most important farther out, at Dione and Rhea. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available