4.7 Article

Resource allocation by the marine cyanobacterium Synechococcus WH8102 in response to different nutrient supply ratios

Journal

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages 1634-1641

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/lno.10123

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. Directorate For Geosciences [1126749] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Directorate For Geosciences
  4. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1046297, 1046001] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1126749] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Differences in relative availability of nitrate vs. phosphate may contribute to regional variations in plankton elemental stoichiometry. As a representative of the globally abundant marine Synechococcus, strain WH8102 was grown in 16 chemostats up to 52 d at a fixed growth rate with nitrogen-phosphorus ratios (N : P-supply) of 1-50. Initially, the phosphate and nitrate concentrations in the vessel decreased when the respective nutrient was limiting. Cell growth generally stabilized, although several chemostats had apparent oscillations in biomass. We observed extensive plasticity in the elemental content and ratios. N : P(cel)l matched the supply values between N : P-supply 5 and 20. The C : Pcell followed a similar trend. In contrast, the mean C : N-cell was 6.8 and did not vary as a function of supply ratios. We also observed that induction of alkaline phosphatase, the fraction of P allocated to nucleic acids, and the lipid sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerol : phosphatidyglycerol ratio inversely correlated with P availability. Our results suggest that this extensive plasticity in the elemental content and ratios depends both on the external nutrient availability as well as past growth history. Thus, our study provides a quantitative understanding of the regulation of the elemental stoichiometry of an abundant ocean phytoplankton lineage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available