4.7 Article

Differences in organic matter and bacterioplankton between sections of the largest Arctic river: Mosaic or continuum?

Journal

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages 1314-1331

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lno.10097

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Siberian Federal University [6.1089.214/K]
  2. Russian Federal Tasks of Fundamental Research [51.1.1]
  3. Attracting Leading Scientists to Russian Educational Institutions Program of the Russian Federation [11.G34.31.0014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We studied biogeochemical characteristics, including organic carbon and nitrogen contents, fatty acid (FA) composition, stable isotope ratios, and primary production in conjunction with species composition of bacterioplankton, using next generation sequencing, in the Yenisei River along a distance similar to 1800km. Basing on FA composition of particulate organic matter (POM) and on other indicators of sources of POM, the river was subdivided into four sections. The upper section 1, situated in mountain region, was the net source of high-quality autochthonous organic matter, produced primarily by diatoms and partly consumed by specialized bacteria species. Section 2 in plain taiga was net sink of high quality allochthonous and autochthonous organic matter, produced by cyanobacteria and green algae. Section 3 was net sink of organic matter, primarily allochthonous, consumed by the specialized species of bacteria. The lowest section 4, situated in tundra, was primarily the conduit of recalcitrant terrestrial organic matter, but also the net source of autochthonous organic matter, produced by diatoms. Biogeochemical traits of sections of the Yenisei River evidently shaped dominant species composition of bacterioplankton of these sections. Regarding the biogeochemical and microbiological data, we concluded that the Yenisei River ecosystem complexly combines features of river mosaic, river continuum, and neutral pipe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available