4.5 Article

Effects of continuous vs. interval exercise training on blood pressure and arterial stiffness in treated hypertension

Journal

HYPERTENSION RESEARCH
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages 627-632

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/hr.2010.42

Keywords

arterial stiffness; blood pressure; exercise

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo SP, Brazil (FAPESP) [2002/06923-9]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq) [304733/2008-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exercise is an effective intervention for treating hypertension and arterial stiffness, but little is known about which exercise modality is the most effective in reducing arterial stiffness and blood pressure in hypertensive subjects. Our purpose was to evaluate the effect of continuous vs. interval exercise training on arterial stiffness and blood pressure in hypertensive patients. Sixty-five patients with hypertension were randomized to 16 weeks of continuous exercise training (n=26), interval training (n=26) or a sedentary routine (n=13). The training was conducted in two 40-min sessions a week. Assessment of arterial stiffness by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurement and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) were performed before and after the 16 weeks of training. At the end of the study, ABPM blood pressure had declined significantly only in the subjects with higher basal values and was independent of training modality. PWV had declined significantly only after interval training from 9.44 +/- 0.91 to 8.90 +/- 0.96 m s(-1), P=0.009 (continuous from 10.15 +/- 1.66 to 9.98 +/- 1.81 m s(-1), P-ns; control from 10.23 +/- 1.82 to 10.53 +/- 1.97 m s(-1), P-ns). Continuous and interval exercise training were beneficial for blood pressure control, but only interval training reduced arterial stiffness in treated hypertensive subjects. Hypertension Research (2010) 33, 627-632; doi:10.1038/hr.2010.42; published online 9 April 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available