4.5 Article

The efficacy of antihypertensive treatment in pregnant women with chronic and gestational hypertension: a population-based study

Journal

HYPERTENSION RESEARCH
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages 460-466

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/hr.2010.17

Keywords

antihypertensive drugs treatments; chronic hypertension; gestational hypertension; low birthweight; pregnancy complications

Funding

  1. Richter Gedeon Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Budapest, Hungary

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The efficacy of antihypertensive treatment was investigated in pregnant women with chronic hypertension (CH) or gestational hypertension (GH) on the basis of the occurrence of pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes. Medically recorded pregnancy complications and birth outcomes of 1579 pregnant women with CH and 1098 pregnant women with GH were compared to 34 633 pregnant women without CH, GH, preeclampsia-eclampsia or any secondary hypertension who delivered newborn infants without defects in the population-based data set of the Hungarian Case-Control Surveillance System of Congenital Abnormalities, 1980-1996. Of 1579 (4.1%) pregnant women with CH, 1522 (96.4%) were treated with antihypertensive drugs. Of 1098 (2.9%) pregnant women with GH, 657 (59.8%) were treated. Pregnant women with treated CH had a higher risk of threatened abortion, preterm delivery, and placental disorders, in addition to low-birthweight newborns. However, pregnant women with untreated CH and GH had no higher risk of pregnancy complications or adverse pregnancy outcomes. Antihypertensive treatments were not able to neutralize the harm of severe CH in pregnant women, the antihypertensive treatments were not appropriate and/or effective, or related drug treatments may contribute to these adverse effects. Hypertension Research (2010) 33, 460-466; doi: 10.1038/hr.2010.17; published online 12 February 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available