4.1 Article

Serum sFlt1:PlGF Ratio, PlGF, and Soluble Endoglin Levels in Gestational Proteinuria

Journal

HYPERTENSION IN PREGNANCY
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 95-108

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10641950802419895

Keywords

Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1; Placental growth factor; Soluble endoglin; Gestational proteinuria; Preeclampsia; Pregnancy

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan [18591809]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: It was recently reported that both a high soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1): placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio (sFlt1:PlGF ratio) and high soluble endoglin (sEng) levels are related to the later occurrence of preeclampsia. We compared the serum sFlt1:PlGF ratio, PlGF and sEng levels in women with gestational proteinuria (GP) to those in women with preeclampsia. Methods: Seven women with GP and 34 women with preeclampsia were recruited in this study. The 95th percentile values in the reference curves of sFlt1, sFlt1:PlGF ratio and sEng, and the 5th percentile values in the reference curve of PlGF were respectively set as the cutoff values. Results: The incidence rates of a high sFlt1:PlGF ratio, low PlGF and high sEng in women with GP were 57%, 29% and 86%, respectively, whereas those in women with preeclampsia were 94%, 77%, and 88%, respectively (p = 0.028, p = 0.024, and p = 1.000, respectively). The incidence rates of a both high sFlt1:PlGF ratio and high sEng in women with GP and preeclampsia were 57% and 88%, respectively (p = 0.082). Conclusion: The majority of women with GP showed both increases of the sFlt1:PlGF ratio and sEng, thus suggesting some women with GP may represent subclinical preeclampsia. In addition, women with GP showed a significantly lower sFlt1:PlGF ratio and higher PlGF level than those with preeclampsia, suggesting that the PlGF level is a key regulator for developing hypertension in some pregnant women, even with increases of both sFlt1:PlGF ratio and sEng levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available