4.7 Article

Biophysical Characterization of the Underappreciated and Important Relationship Between Heart Rate Variability and Heart Rate

Journal

HYPERTENSION
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages 1334-U386

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03782

Keywords

autonomic nervous system; ion channels; physiology; sinoatrial node

Funding

  1. British Cardiovascular Society
  2. British Heart Foundation [RG/11/18/29257]
  3. Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging
  4. Engineering and Physical Science Research Council UK [EP/J00958X/1, EP/I029826/1]
  5. K.G. Jebson Foundation
  6. British Heart Foundation [RG/11/18/29257] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J00958X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. EPSRC [EP/J00958X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heart rate (HR) variability (HRV; beat-to-beat changes in the R-wave to R-wave interval) has attracted considerable attention during the past 30+ years (PubMed currently lists >17 000 publications). Clinically, a decrease in HRV is correlated to higher morbidity and mortality in diverse conditions, from heart disease to fetal distress. It is usually attributed to fluctuation in cardiac autonomic nerve activity. We calculated HRV parameters from a variety of cardiac preparations (including humans, living animals, Langendorff-perfused heart, and single sinoatrial nodal cell) in diverse species, combining this with data from previously published articles. We show that regardless of conditions, there is a universal exponential decay-like relationship between HRV and HR. Using 2 biophysical models, we develop a theory for this and confirm that HRV is primarily dependent on HR and cannot be used in any simple way to assess autonomic nerve activity to the heart. We suggest that the correlation between a change in HRV and altered morbidity and mortality is substantially attributable to the concurrent change in HR. This calls for re-evaluation of the findings from many articles that have not adjusted properly or at all for HR differences when comparing HRV in multiple circumstances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available