4.7 Review

Effect of Fructose on Blood Pressure A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Feeding Trials

Journal

HYPERTENSION
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages 787-U101

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.182311

Keywords

blood pressure; fructose; meta-analysis; diabetes mellitus; guidelines

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Calorie Control Council
  3. Government of Canada
  4. Coca-Cola Company
  5. Abbott Laboratories
  6. Archer Daniels Midland
  7. International Life Sciences Institute North America
  8. Pulse Canada
  9. Barilla
  10. Solae
  11. Unilever
  12. Hain Celestial
  13. Loblaws Supermarkets
  14. Oldways Preservation Trust
  15. Almond Board of California
  16. International Nut Council
  17. Paramount Farms
  18. California Strawberry Commission
  19. Saskatchewan Pulse Growers
  20. Sanitarium Company
  21. Herbalife International
  22. Pacific Health Laboratories Inc
  23. Metagenics/MetaProteomics
  24. Bayer Consumer Care
  25. International Tree Nut Council Nutrition Research Education
  26. Peanut Institute
  27. Procter and Gamble Technical Centre Limited
  28. Griffin Hospital for the development of the NuVal System
  29. Pepsi Company
  30. Soy Advisory Board of Dean Foods
  31. Alpro Soy Foundation
  32. Nutritional Fundamentals for Health
  33. Pacific Health Laboratories
  34. Kellogg's
  35. Quaker Oats
  36. Coca-Cola Sugar Advisory Board
  37. Agrifoods and Agriculture Canad (AAFC)
  38. Canadian Agriculture Policy Institute (CAPI)
  39. Orafti
  40. Canola Council of Canada
  41. Flax Council of Canada
  42. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  43. Ontario Research Fund
  44. Advanced Foods and Material Network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Concerns have been raised about the adverse effect of fructose on blood pressure. International dietary guidelines, however, have not addressed fructose intake directly. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effect of fructose in isocaloric exchange for other carbohydrates on systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressures. Studies were identified using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases (through January 9, 2012). Human clinical trials of isocaloric oral fructose exchange for other carbohydrate sources for >= 7 days were included in the analysis. Data were pooled by the generic inverse variance method using random-effects models and expressed as mean differences with 95% CI. Heterogeneity was assessed by the Q-statistic and quantified by I-2. Study quality was assessed using the Heyland Methodological Quality Score. Thirteen isocaloric (n=352) and 2 hypercaloric (n=24) trials met the eligibility criteria. Overall, fructose intake in isocaloric exchange for other carbohydrates significantly decreased diastolic (mean difference: -1.54 [95% CI: -2.77 to -0.32]) and mean arterial pressure (mean difference: -1.16 [95% CI: -2.15 to -0.18]). There was no significant effect of fructose on systolic blood pressure (mean difference: -1.10 [95% CI: -2.46 to 0.44]). The hypercaloric fructose feeding trials found no significant overall mean arterial blood pressure effect of fructose in comparison with other carbohydrates. To confirm these results, longer and larger trials are needed. Contrary to previous concerns, we found that isocaloric substitution of fructose for other carbohydrates did not adversely affect blood pressure in humans. (Hypertension. 2012;59:787-795.). Online Data Supplement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available