4.1 Article

Molecular data support Pseudoparmelia as a distinct lineage related to Relicina and Relicinopsis (Ascomycota, Lecanorales)

Journal

LICHENOLOGIST
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 43-49

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0024282914000577

Keywords

generic concept; lichens; molecular systematics; Parmeliaceae; parmelioid lichens; taxonomy

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [CGL 2010-21646/BOS, CGL2013-42498-P]
  2. Universidad Complutense-Banco Santander [GR 35/10A]
  3. Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid (REMEDINAL) [S-2009/AMB-1783]
  4. Thai Research Fund through the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. program
  5. Negaunee Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The phylogenetic position of the genus Pseudoparmelia was addressed using molecular data from five loci (mtSSU, nuLSU, ITS, Mcm7, RPB1), generated from three species and aligned with sequences from 293 samples representing all major clades of Parmeliaceae. Pseudoparmelia species form a well-supported monophyletic group that is the sister group of a clade consisting of the genera Relicina and Relicinopsis. These three genera share a thallus with a pored epicortex, isolichenan as cell wall polysaccharide, and relatively small ascospores. Morphological and chemical characters that distinguish Pseudoparmelia from the closely related Relicina and Relicinopsis are discussed. To further elucidate the relationships of these three genera, we assembled a second dataset including 15 additional samples of Relicina and Relicinopsis using three loci (mtSSU, nuLSU, ITS). All three genera are monophyletic but monophyly of Relicina lacks support and, in the mtSSU single locus tree, the genus is paraphyletic with Relicinopsis nested within. Additional studies including more Relicina species are necessary to test delimitation of the genera Relicina and Relicinopsis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available