4.7 Article

Long-term circulatory consequences of perinatal iron deficiency in male Wistar rats

Journal

HYPERTENSION
Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 154-159

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.100446

Keywords

anemia; iron deficiency; fetal development; blood pressure; telemetry; kidney

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Perinatal iron deficiency (PID) has been reported to induce developmental abnormalities, including cardiovascular complications in rats. These complications are believed to be programmed by an aberrant perinatal environment because the changes persist long after the insult is corrected (ie, despite subsequent iron replenishment). Little is known about the mechanisms by which PID affects blood pressure in the offspring, although the kidney is likely to play a central role. The objective of this study was to investigate the circulatory complications of PID and the putative role of the kidney involved therein. Before and throughout gestation, female Wistar rats were fed either a low-iron diet (3 ppm/10 ppm Fe) or an iron-enriched diet (225 ppm Fe). After giving birth, all of the dams were placed on a standard grain-based diet. At 24 hours postpartum, hematocrits and hemoglobin levels from offspring of iron-deficient mothers were 60% and 59% of control values, respectively. Adult PID animals had greater mean arterial pressures (110 versus 106 mm Hg) and systolic blood pressures (129 versus124 mm Hg) than controls, as assessed by radiotelemetry. The relationship between renal arterial pressure and renal interstitial hydrostatic pressure, assessed in anesthetized rats, was blunted by 41% in the PID group compared with controls. In addition, arterial pressure changes were significantly greater in response to altered sodium in the PID animals compared with controls. These data confirm that PID adversely affects blood pressure control, which seems to be mediated, at least in part, by altered intrarenal hemodynamic properties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available