4.7 Article

Shift work is a risk factor for increased blood pressure in Japanese men - A 14-year historical cohort study

Journal

HYPERTENSION
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages 581-586

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.114553

Keywords

shift work; blood pressure; cohort study; primary prevention; epidemiology; risk factors; Japanese

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [17590508]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To clarify the effect of shift work on blood pressure in Japanese men, a 14-year historical cohort study was conducted in day workers (n = 3963) and alternating shift workers (n = 2748) who received annual health checkups between 1991 and 2005 in a Japanese steel company. The end points were a >= 10%, >= 15%, >= 20%, >= 25%, or >= 30% increase in systolic blood pressure or diastolic blood pressure from baseline during the period of observation. The association between shift work and an increase in blood pressure was investigated adjusting for age, body mass index, hemoglobin A1c, total serum cholesterol, creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, uric acid, drinking habit, smoking habit, and habitual exercise by multivariate pooled logistic regression analyses. Shift work was significantly associated with the various end points. The odds ratios (and 95% CIs) were as follows: >= 10%, 1.15 (1.07 to 1.23); >= 15%, 1.21 (1.12 to 1.31); >= 20%, 1.15 (1.04 to 1.28); >= 25%, 1.20 (1.06 to 1.37); and >= 30%, 1.23 (1.03 to 1.47) for systolic blood pressure and >= 10%, 1.19 (1.11 to 1.28); >= 15%, 1.22 (1.13 to 1.33); >= 20%, 1.24 (1.13 to 1.37); and >= 25%, 1.16 (1.03 to 1.30) for diastolic blood pressure. Our study in male Japanese workers revealed that alternating shift work was a significant independent risk factor for an increase in blood pressure. Moreover, the effect of shift work on blood pressure was more pronounced than other well-established factors, such as age and body mass index.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available