4.7 Article

Solvent extraction and separation of rare-earths from phosphoric acid solutions with TOPS 99

Journal

HYDROMETALLURGY
Volume 110, Issue 1-4, Pages 50-55

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2011.08.004

Keywords

Solvent extraction; Rare-earths separation; Phosphoric acid; TOPS 99; Stripping

Funding

  1. IRELTDC, DAE, Kollam [IRETDC/SAO/06 (GAP-0182)]
  2. CSIR, New Delhi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

TOPS 99, an equivalent to di-2-ethylhexyl phosphoric acid has been employed for the solvent extraction and separation of a mixture of rare-earths (four light rare-earths (LREs) La, Ce, Pr, Nd, and seven heavy rare-earths (HREs) like Tb, Dy, Y, Ho, Er, Yb and Lu) into some fractions from phosphoric acid solutions. From the acid and extractant effects. 0.1 and 1 M TOPS 99 were suitable for the separation of a mixture of REs into three concentrates at 3 M acid, which is similar to wet phosphoric acid solutions (WPA). McCabe-Thiele extraction isotherm predicts the separation of Yb + Lu at an aqueous-to-organic (A/O) phase ratio of 2 in three stages using 0.1 M TOPS 99. Counter-current batch extraction simulation (CCES) of Yb and Lu at an A/O of 2 resulted in a raffinate containing 3.6 mg/L of Yb + Lu, corresponding to an extraction efficiency of 91.9%, whereas other five HREs loss was about 6.7%. Stripping of Yb and Lu as per the predictions of McCabe-Thiele plot from loaded organic (LO) was selected at O/A phase ratio of 3 with 4 M HCl and counter-current stripping simulation studies resulted 100% stripping efficiency. From the Yb + Lu raffinate, remaining five HREs were extracted about 94.4% with 1 M TOPS 99 at an A/O ratio of 3 in three stages. The LRE (Pr and Nd) co extraction is 9.8%. Quantitative stripping of HREs from LO is achieved with 7 M HCl at an O/A ratio of 3 in two stages. Finally, a process flowsheet was presented for the separation of rare-earths into three groups, two HRE fractions (Yb + Lu and Tb, Dy, Ho, Y, Er) and one LRE fraction from 3 M phosphoric acid. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available