4.3 Article

Accuracy of physician assessment of treatment preferences and health status in elderly patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

Journal

LEUKEMIA RESEARCH
Volume 39, Issue 8, Pages 859-865

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.05.012

Keywords

Health status; Decision making; Myelodysplastic syndromes; Cancer; Oncology; Hematology

Funding

  1. Associazione Italiana contro le Leucemie, Linfomi e Mieloma (AIL)
  2. Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are rarely curable and have a poor prognosis. We investigated the accuracy of physicians' perception of patients' health status and the patients' preferences for involvement in treatment decisions. We examined 280 newly diagnosed higher-risk elderly MDS patients paired with their physicians. Survey tools included the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Control Preference Scale. Overall concordance was 49% for physician perception of patient preferences for involvement in treatment decisions. In 36.4% of comparisons there were minor differences and in 14.6% there were major differences. In 44.7% of the patients preferring a passive role, physicians perceived them as preferring anactive or collaborative role. Absence of the patient's request for prognostic information (P = 0.001) and judging the patient as having a poor health status (P = 0.036) were factors independently associated with the physicians' attitude toward a lower degree of patient involvement in clinical decisions. Agreement on health status was found in 27.5% of cases. Physicians most frequently tended to overestimate healthstatus of patients who reported low-level health status. The value of decision aid-tools in the challenging setting of higher-risk MDS should be investigated to further promote patient-centered care. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available