4.6 Article

Predicting new snow density in the Italian Alps: A variability analysis based on 10years of measurements

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
Volume 32, Issue 20, Pages 3174-3187

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.13249

Keywords

analysis of variance; Italian Alps; mountain chain scale; new snow density; observed variability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite its strong impact on the time evolution of the snowpack, current estimation of new snow density ((hn)) is usually accomplished either by using local empirical techniques or by assuming a constant snow density. Faced with the lack of an estimation model of (hn) valid for a wide spatial scale and supported by a suitable number of observations, this study aims to develop simple monthly linear regression models at scale of the entire Italian Alpine chain based on 12,112 snowfall observations at 122 stations, using only air temperature as predictor. Moreover, the remaining variance is investigated in both time and space, also considering some qualitative features of the snowfall events. The daily (hn) measurements present a mean value of 115kgm(-3) (105 and 159kgm(-3) for dry and wet conditions, respectively). The mean air temperature of the 24hr preceding the snowfall event has been found to be the best predictor of the (hn), within 31% of uncertainty. The analysis of associated residues allows supporting the idea that the adoption of a more local approach than the one analysed here is not able to substantially increase the predictive capabilities of the model. In fact, the main factor explaining the remaining variance over the air temperature is the wind, but in a complex orography, as mountain regions are, supplying realistic local wind fields is particularly challenging. Therefore, we conclude that using only the daily mean temperature as predictor is a good choice for estimating daily new snow density at scale of Italian Alpine chain, as well as at more regional scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available