4.6 Article

Using the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis as weather input data for watershed models

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
Volume 28, Issue 22, Pages 5613-5623

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10073

Keywords

watershed modelling; meteorological forcing data; Climate Forecast System Reanalysis

Funding

  1. International Water Management Institute (IWMI), an international research centre under the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) umbrella
  2. Challenge Program for Water and Food
  3. Texas AgriLife Research part of the Texas AM System

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Obtaining representative meteorological data for watershed-scale hydrological modelling can be difficult and time consuming. Land-based weather stations do not always adequately represent the weather occurring over a watershed, because they can be far from the watershed of interest and can have gaps in their data series, or recent data are not available. This study presents a method for using the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) global meteorological dataset to obtain historical weather data and demonstrates the application to modelling five watersheds representing different hydroclimate regimes. CFSR data are available globally for each hour since 1979 at a 38-km resolution. Results show that utilizing the CFSR precipitation and temperature data to force a watershed model provides stream discharge simulations that are as good as or better than models forced using traditional weather gauging stations, especially when stations are more than 10km from the watershed. These results further demonstrate that adding CFSR data to the suite of watershed modelling tools provides new opportunities for meeting the challenges of modelling un-gauged watersheds and advancing real-time hydrological modelling. Copyright (C) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available