4.6 Article

Initial impacts of a wildfire on hydrology and suspended sediment and nutrient export in California chaparral watersheds

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
Volume 27, Issue 26, Pages 3842-3851

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9508

Keywords

nutrient export; sediment export; wildfire; chaparral; runoff

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation [OCE99-82105, OCE-0620276]
  2. University of California Staff Educational Fee Reduction programme
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [1232779] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1232779] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stream and rainfall gauging and runoff sampling were used to determine changes in hydrology and export of nutrients and suspended sediment from a June 2004 wildfire that burned 3010ha in chaparral coastal watersheds of the Santa Ynez Mountains, California. Precipitation during water year 2005 exceeded average precipitation by 200-260%. Burned watersheds had order of magnitude higher peak discharge compared with unburned watersheds but similar annual runoff. Suspended sediment export of 181mtha(-1) from a burned watershed was approximately ten times greater than from unburned watersheds. Ammonium export from burned watersheds largely occurred during the first three storms and was 32 times greater than from unburned watersheds. Nitrate, dissolved organic nitrogen, and phosphate export from burned watersheds increased by 5.5, 2.8, and 2.2 times, respectively, compared with unburned chaparral watersheds. Storm runoff and peak discharge increase in burned compared with unburned sites were greatest during early season storms when enhanced runoff occurred. As the winter progressed, closely spaced storms and above average precipitation reduced the fire-related impacts that resulted in significant increases in annual post-fire runoff and export in other studies in southern California chaparral. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available