4.6 Article

Suspended sediment balance for the mainstem of Changjiang (Yangtze River) in the period 1964-1985

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
Volume 25, Issue 15, Pages 2339-2353

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7996

Keywords

Suspended sediment; fluvial sediment balance; Yangtze River; sediment exchange; channel morphology; reach sediment balance

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [40701018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Suspended sediment dynamics during the period 1964-1985 are examined along the mainstem of Changjiang (Yangtze River). The period represents a basin condition prior to major changes in land management policy and dam building on the river's mainstem. The downstream sediment dynamics reflect basin geology and topography and channel morphology. Sediment exchange within the mainstem was calculated by the development of reach sediment balances that reveal complex temporal and spatial patterns. There is relatively little sediment exchange in the upper, bedrock-controlled reaches, with systematic increases in the downstream alluvial reaches. Degrading, transfer, and aggrading reaches were identified. Relations between input and output in all reaches were significant but no relation was found between sediment exchange and input/output. Comparison between 'short-term' (22 years) and 'long-term' (52 years) records demonstrates the importance of the record length in studying the suspended sediment dynamics in a large fluvial system. The longer record yielded better correlation and different trends than the shorter record. Sediment transfer (output/input ratio) changes downstream: the dominance of the upstream contributing area in sustaining the appearance of net degradation through most of the river system highlights the importance of reach length on characterisation of suspended sediment dynamics in large fluvial systems. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available