4.6 Article

Quantifying the effects of climate variability and human activities on runoff from the Laohahe basin in northern China using three different methods

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
Volume 25, Issue 16, Pages 2492-2505

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.8002

Keywords

climate variability; human activities; runoff; multi-regression; hydrologic sensitivity analysis; hydrologic model

Funding

  1. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering [2009585412]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, China [2009IM020104]
  3. National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China [40901017]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2010516]
  5. Ministry of Education
  6. State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs, China [B08048]
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2009B11614, 2010B13614]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Much attention has recently been focused on the effects that climate variability and human activities have had on runoff. In this study, these effects are quantified using three methods, namely, multi-regression, hydrologic sensitivity analysis, and hydrologic model simulation. A conceptual framework is defined to separate the effects. As an example, the change in annual runoff from the semiarid Laohahe basin (18 112 km(2)) in northern China was investigated. Non-parametric Mann-Kendall test, Pettitt test, and precipitation-runoff double cumulative curve method were adopted to identify the trends and change-points in the annual runoff from 1964 to 2008 by first dividing the long-term runoff series into a natural period (1964-1979) and a human-induced period (1980-2008). Then the three quantifying methods were calibrated and calculated, and they provided consistent estimates of the percentage change in mean annual runoff for the human-induced period. In 1980-2008, human activities were the main factors that reduced runoff with contributions of 89-93%, while the reduction percentages due to changes in precipitation and potential evapotranspiration only ranged from 7 to 11%. For the various effects at different durations, human activities were the main reasons runoff decreased during the two drier periods of 1980-1989 and 2000-2008. Increased runoff during the wetter period of 1990-1999 is mainly attributed to climate variability. This study quantitatively separates the effects of climate variability and human activities on runoff, which can serve as a reference for regional water resources assessment and management. Copyright. (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available