4.6 Article

Estimating the deep seepage component of the hillslope and catchment water balance within a measurement uncertainty framework

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
Volume 24, Issue 25, Pages 3631-3647

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7788

Keywords

hillslope hydrology; water balance; experimental uncertainty; deep seepage; hysteresis; sprinkling experiments

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB 021-8088]
  2. Ecosystem Informatics IGERT
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology [0823380] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deep seepage is a term in the hillslope and catchment water balance that is rarely measured and usually relegated to a residual in the water balance equation. While recent studies have begun to quantify this important component, we still lack understanding of how deep seepage varies from hillslope to catchment scales and how much uncertainty surrounds its quantification within the overall water balance. Here, we report on a hillslope water balance study from the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest in Oregon aimed at quantifying the deep seepage component where we irrigated a 172-m(2) section of hillslope for 24.4 days at 3.6 +/- 3 mm/h. The objective of this experiment was to close the water balance, identifying the relative partitioning of, and uncertainties around deep seepage and the other measured water balance components of evaporation, transpiration, lateral subsurface flow, bedrock return flow and fluxes into and out of soil profile storage. We then used this information to determine how the quantification of individual water balance components improves our understanding of key hillslope processes and how uncertainties in individual measurements propagate through the functional uses of the measurements into water balance components (i.e. meteorological measurements propagated through potential evapotranspiration estimates). Our results show that hillslope scale deep seepage composed of 27 +/- 17% of applied water. During and immediately after the irrigation experiment, a significant amount of the irrigation water could not be accounted for. This amount decreased as the measurement time increased, declining from 28 +/- 16% at the end of the irrigation to 20 +/- 21% after 10 days drainage. This water is attributed to deep seepage at the catchment scale. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available