4.6 Article

Reconstructing snow water equivalent in the Rio Grande headwaters using remotely sensed snow cover data and a spatially distributed snowmelt model

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages 1076-1089

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7206

Keywords

snow and ice; snowmelt; modelling; remote sensing; water supply

Funding

  1. Division Of Earth Sciences
  2. Directorate For Geosciences [1032308] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Snow covered area (SCA) observations from the Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper (ETM+) were used in combination with a distributed snowmelt model to estimate snow water equivalent (SWE) in the headwaters of the Rio Grande basin (3,419 km(2)) - a spatial scale that is an order of magnitude greater than previous reconstruction model applications. In this reconstruction approach, modeled snowmelt over each pixel is integrated over the time of ETM+ observed snow cover to estimate SWE. Considerable differences in the magnitude of SWE were simulated during the study. Basin-wide mean SWE was 2.6 times greater in April 2001 versus 2002. Despite these climatological differences, the model adequately recovered SWE at intensive study areas (ISAs); mean absolute SWE error was 23% relative to observed SWE. Reconstruction model SWE errors were within one standard deviation of the mean observed SWE over 37 and 55% of the four 16-km(2) intensive field campaign study sites in 2001 and 20(12, respectively; a result comparable to previous works at much smaller scales. A key strength of the technique is that spatially distributed SWE estimates are not dependent upon ground-based observations of SWE. Moreover, the model was relatively insensitive to the location of forcing observations relative to commonly used statistical SWE interpolation models. Hence, the reconstruction technique is a viable approach for obtaining high-resolution SWE estimates at larger scales (e.g. > 1000 km(2)) and in locations where detailed hydrometeorological observations are scarce. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available