4.6 Article

Application of a coil-type TDR probe for measuring the volumetric water content in weathered granitic bedrock

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 750-763

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6663

Keywords

volumetric water content; TDR technique; coil-type; bedrock; weathered granite

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As a first step toward describing water flow processes in bedrock, a coil-type time domain reflectometry (TDR) probe capable of measuring volumetric water content, theta, in weathered bedrock at three depths was prepared, Because the coil-type TDR probe is large in diameter (19 mm), it can be installed even in highly weathered bedrock more easily and appropriately than conventional TDR probes that consists of two or three rods of small diameter (5-8 mm). The probe calibrations suggest that the values measured by the probe are very sensitive to changes in theta. Using the calibrated probe together with commercially available profile soil moisture sensors, the theta profile was monitored for I year. Even rainfall events with relatively small cumulative rainfall of 15 mm increased the bedrock theta, and the increments were comparable to those in the soil. After the end of the rainfall events, the bedrock theta displayed a more rapid drop than the soil, and varied little during the period of no rainfall. The water storage showed similar tendencies. These observations suggest that the bedrock theta is controlled by clearly distinguishable macropores and micropores within the bedrock. It is concluded that the coil-type TDR probe is very effective in determining theta in weathered bedrock, and that bedrock, conventionally defined by conducting cone penetration tests and treated as impermeable. does conduct and hold substantial amounts of water, and therefore contribute greatly to hydrological processes in headwater catchments. Copyright (C) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available