4.6 Article

Effects of 2003 wildfires on stream chemistry in Glacier National Park, Montana

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
Volume 22, Issue 26, Pages 5013-5023

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7121

Keywords

stream chemistry; wildfire; nitrogen; nutrient fluxes; snowmelt; Rocky Mountains

Funding

  1. National Park Service
  2. US Geological Survey Water-Quality Partnership Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Changes in stream chemistry were studied for 4 years following large wildfires that burned in Glacier National Park during the summer of 2003. Burned and unburned drainages were monitored from December 2003 through August 2007 for streamflow, major constituents, nutrients, and suspended sediment following the fires. Stream-water nitrate concentrations showed the greatest response to fire, increasing up to tenfold above those in the unburned drainage just prior to the first post-fire snowmelt season. concentrations in winter base flow remained elevated during the entire study period, whereas concentrations during the growing season return to background levels after tow snowmelt seasons. Annual export of total nitrogen from the burned drainage ranged from 1.53 to 3.23 kg ha(-1) yr(-1) compared with 1.01 to 1.39 kg ha(-1) yr(-1) from the unburned drainage and exceeded atomspheric inputs for the first two post-fire water years. Fire appeared to have minimal long-term effects on other nutrients, dissolved organic carbon, and major constituents with the exception of sulfate and chloride, which showed increased concentrations for 2 years following the fire. There was little evidence that fire affected suspended-sediment concentrations in the burned drainage. Sediment yields in subalpine streams may be less affected by fire than in lower elevation streams because of the slow release rate of water during spring snowmelt. Published in 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available