4.5 Article

Estimation of seawater-groundwater exchange rate: case study in a tidal flat with a large-scale seepage face (Laizhou Bay, China)

Journal

HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 265-275

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-014-1196-z

Keywords

Seepage face; Submarine groundwater discharge; Tidal flat; Groundwater density; China

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41025009, 41272267]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The exchange rate between seawater and groundwater in a tidal flat was investigated at Laizhou Bay, China, where there are large-scale seepage faces with horizontal extension of several hundred meters developed during low tides. Taking into account the effects of seepage face and density, a simple and efficient method for estimating seawater-groundwater exchange rate is proposed, based on field measurements of groundwater hydraulic head, temperature and salinity. First, the exchange rate at each well was obtained using the generalized Darcy's law, then the results were interpolated and integrated along the whole transect. The total submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) and inflow were estimated to be 8.8 and 15.3 m(3) d(-1) m(-1), respectively. The spatial distributions of SGD and inflow were different from those of sandy or gravel beaches possibly owing to the low-permeability sediment (silty sand with mud), very gentle slope, and the large-scale seepage faces. A freshwater discharge tube was identified near the low-tide line, as evidenced by significant increase in outflow and low salinity of groundwater observed there. The SGD from the seepage faces accounted for similar to 21 % of the total SGD. The outflow rate that occurred from the seepage faces, and the ratio of the outflow from the seepage faces to the total outflow, decreased seaward significantly and monotonically.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available