4.6 Article

Downstream fish assemblage response to river impoundment varies with degree of hydrologic alteration

Journal

HYDROBIOLOGIA
Volume 728, Issue 1, Pages 23-39

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-013-1797-x

Keywords

Flow alteration; Flow regimes; Dams; Impoundments; Fish assemblages; Fluvial specialists

Funding

  1. U.S. Geological Survey-U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Science Support Partnership Program
  2. Oklahoma and New York Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Units

Ask authors/readers for more resources

River impoundments can fundamentally restructure downstream fish assemblages by altering flow regimes. However, the degree of alteration and associated ecological change may depend on pre-existing hydrologic regimes. We used long-term datasets to compare downstream hydrological and fish assemblage responses to impoundment in two catchments classified as having intermittent and perennial-flashy natural hydrologic regimes. We observed significant shifts in fish assemblage structure at both sites after stream impoundment. The historically intermittent stream shifted to a stable perennial flow regime. Changes in fish assemblage structure covaried with changes in five different components of the flow regime; most species that increased in abundance require fluvial habitats and likely benefited from increased flows during historically low flow seasons. Shifts in fish assemblage structure were also observed in the perennial stream, despite minimal flow alteration after impoundment; however, most species shifts were associated with lentic environments, and were more likely related to proximity of reservoirs in the drainage system rather than changes in stream flow. Findings from this study confirm that downstream fish assemblage response to river impoundment can be associated with high levels of hydrologic alteration, but other factors including expansion of lentic species into lotic environments also influence shifts in assemblage structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available