4.6 Article

Nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria (free-living and diatom endosymbionts): their use in southern California stream bioassessment

Journal

HYDROBIOLOGIA
Volume 720, Issue 1, Pages 111-127

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-013-1630-6

Keywords

Nutrients; Nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria; Nostoc; Calothrix; Rivularia; Cyanobacterial endosymbionts in Epithemia and Rhopalodia; Stream Bioassessment; California

Funding

  1. California State Water Resources Control Board Consolidated Grants
  2. SWAMP Programs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A weight-of-evidence approach was used to examine how nutrient availability influences stream benthic algal community structure and to validate nutrient-response thresholds in assessing nutrient limitation. Data from 104 southern California streams spanning broad nutrient gradients revealed that relative abundance of N-2-fixing heterocystous cyanobacteria (Nostoc, Calothrix), and diatoms (Epithemia, Rhopalodia)-containing cyanobacterial endosymbionts, decreased with increasing ambient inorganic N concentrations within the low end of the N gradient. Response thresholds for these N-2 fixers were 0.075 mg l(-1) NO3-N, 0.04 mg l(-1) NH4-N, and an N:P ratio (by weight) of 15:1. The NO3-N threshold was independently validated by observing nitrogenase gene expression using real-time reverse transcriptase PCR. Morphometric analysis of cyanobacterial endosymbionts in Epithemia and Rhopalodia indicated that endosymbiont biovolume per diatom cell decreased with increasing NO3-N. Our findings indicate that abundance of heterocyst-containing cyanobacteria and endosymbiont-containing diatom cells are good indicators for rapid nutrient biomonitoring. Because heterocystous cyanobacteria and Epithemia/Rhopalodia were not always recorded together at N-limited sites, examining both assemblages jointly may provide a more comprehensive assessment of stream nutrient limitation than using either assemblage alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available