4.6 Article

Water clarity and eelgrass responses to nitrogen reductions in the eutrophic Skive Fjord, Denmark

Journal

HYDROBIOLOGIA
Volume 704, Issue 1, Pages 293-309

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-012-1266-y

Keywords

Eelgrass depth limit; Eutrophication; Light attenuation; Nutrients; Oligotrophication; Secchi depth

Funding

  1. European Commission [226273]
  2. Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation [09-063190]
  3. Danish Council for Strategic Research [09-067259]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Eelgrass depth limits and water clarity in the Skive Fjord estuarine system have not improved despite nutrient input reductions of 30%. Long-term monitoring data (1989-2010) were used to investigate the underlying causes. Dissolved inorganic and organic nitrogen concentrations decreased significantly over time, whereas particulate organic nitrogen concentration, assumed to consist primarily of phytoplankton and phytoplankton detritus and calculated as a proportional factor to chlorophyll a, did not change. Total organic carbon, mostly of autochthonous origin, remained constant despite reduced nitrogen concentrations, resulting in an increasing C:N ratio of the organic material in the water column. Phytoplankton primary production also remained constant suggesting that phytoplankton growth was only limited by nitrogen to a minor degree. Alleviated grazing pressure caused by a reduction in the blue mussel standing stock and a pelagic food web dominated by jellyfish may have contributed to the constantly high phytoplankton levels. Particulate inorganic matter, likely reflecting sediment resuspension, increased over time, most probably in response to removal of blue mussels and declining eelgrass cover. The Skive Fjord estuarine system is affected by multiple pressures-nutrient enrichment, mussel dredging and climate change that must be addressed together for water clarity to improve and eelgrass to recover.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available