4.6 Article

Towards harmonization of ecological quality classification: establishing common grounds in European macrophyte assessment for rivers

Journal

HYDROBIOLOGIA
Volume 652, Issue 1, Pages 149-163

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-010-0327-3

Keywords

Intercalibration; Common metric; European Water Framework Directive; Common stream type; Reference community

Funding

  1. German Bund-/Landerarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser
  2. Scotland and Northern Ireland Forum for Environmental Research
  3. Environment Agency of England and Wales

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Different national assessment concepts impede the harmonization of river quality classifications using macrophytes in Europe. This study describes a procedure to identify similarities between the national methods for ecological quality assessment of Austria, Belgium (Flanders and Wallonia), France, Germany, Great Britain and Poland. Based on an international data set covering three European stream types we identified sites commonly assessed as high status by most methods. A mean index derived from averaging the national assessment results per stream site was then correlated with the abundance of each macrophyte taxon. We defined common macrophyte indicator scores using these correlation coefficients. This enabled the description of type-specific macrophyte communities under near-natural and degraded conditions, and the development of a common metric (mICM) that was correlated with all national methods. The weaker relations of the Flemish and German methods were improved by adjusting national indicator scores of selected macrophyte taxa that deviated from the common indicator scores. The analysis of common high status sites provided mICM reference values. This study offers a general approach to harmonize the national assessment methods for biological elements of any water category.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available