4.6 Article

Plant growth and nutrient removal in constructed monoculture and mixed wetlands related to stubble attributes

Journal

HYDROBIOLOGIA
Volume 661, Issue 1, Pages 251-260

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-010-0530-2

Keywords

Monoculture; Mixed wetland; Constructed wetland; Nutrient removal rate; Biomass; Stubble growth

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30470346]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [06025056]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that it depends on plant species used in the wetlands and their stubble growth attributes, as to whether monoculture or mixed wetland is superior in plant growth and nutrient removal. Monoculture and mixed wetland microcosms of five wetland plant species were studied. Significant differences in growth and aboveground biomass were found in the monoculture wetlands. Species that showed faster growth and larger biomass in monoculture wetland were also dominant in the mixed wetland. The mixed wetland exhibited similar biomass and root growth to the averages of five monocultures. ANOVA showed that there were very significant differences among the wetlands in removal rates of all the nutrients studied except nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) and chemical oxygen demand (COD). The removal rates from the mixed wetland were generally comparable to the highest removal rates from the monocultures. The species exhibited different stubble growth attributes, with some species showing increasing stubble growth and removal rates, while other species showing decreasing stubble growth and removal rates. The results indicated that in both monocultures and mixed constructed wetlands, growth and nutrient removal rates depended on plant species, and attributes of plant stubble growth affected overall growth and nutrient removal capabilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available