4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

A method for prioritizing the reestablishment of river continuity in Austrian rivers

Journal

HYDROBIOLOGIA
Volume 609, Issue -, Pages 277-288

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-008-9406-0

Keywords

river continuity; ecological status; fish migration; connectivity; priority list; Water Framework Directive; river restoration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

River continuity is one of the hydro-morphological elements supporting the classification of the ecological status of rivers. In order to achieve good ecological status in the continuity of rivers, the impacts of anthropogenic activities must be limited to the extent that some fish age classes may be missing and there may only be slight changes in species composition and abundance from the type specific community. The main goal of the project is to list priorities for removing obstruction to migration within 12 years to reestablish river continuity so as to allow undisturbed migration of aquatic organisms. The ecological status of the river, the cost-benefit ratio of the proposed restoration and the distance between obstructions are analysed. More than 200 obstructions in about 170 km of river were evaluated. A 1st ranking of the parameter extension of undisturbed river length shows significant alterations in comparison with the 2nd and 3rd ranking, where the river length is weighted over the parameters ecological status of the river reach and the cost-benefit ratio of the measure. The ecological status is classified by comparing the present versus the potential natural morphological conditions (Leitbild). The cost-benefit ratio takes into account the increase of the fish species composition and the cost of the measures in relation to local circumstances of available property and height of the drop. Examples of obstructions in the Pinka R. move back in the priority list to a maximum of -9 places and forwards to a maximum of +8 places. As a result the list of obstructions by priority for removal to be removed first at the top is analysed. The financial policy and a schedule for removal for the period 2003-2015 are based upon the results of the priority list.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available