4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Challenges for the evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus protein based vaccines Monitoring antigenic diversity

Journal

HUMAN VACCINES
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages 51-59

Publisher

LANDES BIOSCIENCE
DOI: 10.4161/hv.7.0.14562

Keywords

clumping factor A; clumping factor B; ClfA; ClfB; MLST; clonal complex; spa typing; evolution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clumping factors A (ClfA) and B (ClfB) are Staphylococcus aureus virulence proteins that are displayed on the cell surface of the organism and have potential as vaccine antigens for the prevention of S. aureus disease. Here we evaluate the phylogeny of S. aureus in the context of antigenic variation of these two surface proteins. ClfA and ClfB gene sequences, along with epidemiological markers (MLST, spa and capsule genotype) were obtained for 224 S. aureus isolates including both historical strains and a collection representative of current MRSA isolates from the United States. Variation within ClfA and ClfB was consistent with the established population biology of S. aureus, namely, that S. aureus strains belong to a relatively small number of clonal lineages, with evolution proceeding mainly by mutation and with little to no recombination between clades. Thus most variation in ClfA and ClfB occurs between but not within lineages, and particular groups of ClfA and ClfB variants are closely linked. This has important implications for vaccine development and assessment as it suggests that a relatively small survey of strains will be representative of the total population variation, whereas for species that evolve mainly by recombination, such as Neisseria meningitidis, analysis of a much larger number of strains is needed to accomplish the same purpose. Our study also revealed evidence for the de-evolution of ClfB and therefore its reduced suitability as a target for vaccine development compared to ClfA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available