4.6 Review

Genetic predictors of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: where do we stand today?

Journal

HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 813-828

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmr034

Keywords

controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; genetic variation; in vitro fertilization; polymorphism; pharmacogenetics

Funding

  1. Karolinska Institutet
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. Stockholm County Council
  4. Uppsala University
  5. Family Planning Foundation Uppsala
  6. Enterprise Estonia [EU30200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, the use of IVF has improved the prospects of infertility treatment. The expected outcome of IVF depends greatly on the effectiveness of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH), where exogenous gonadotrophins are used to induce folliculogenesis. The response to stimulation varies substantially among women and is difficult to predict. Several predictive markers of COH outcome have been proposed (e. g. maternal age and ovarian reserve), but the search for optimal predictors is ongoing. Pharmacogenetic studies demonstrate the effects of individual genetic variability on COH outcome and the potential for customizing therapy based on the patient's genome. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, DARE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library, and references from relevant articles were investigated up to February 2011 regarding any common genetic variation and COH/IVF outcome. RESULTS: Several polymorphisms in genes involved in FSH signalling, estrogen biosynthesis, folliculogenesis, folate metabolism and other aspects influence the response to exogenous gonadotrophin administration, resulting in differences in COH and IVF outcomes. Nevertheless, the most studied polymorphism FSHR Asn680Ser is practically the only genetic marker, together with ESR1 PvuII T/C, that could be applied in clinical tests. CONCLUSIONS: Although data are accumulating with evidence suggesting that the ovarian response to COH is mediated by various polymorphisms, the optimal biomarkers and the efficacy of the tests still remain to be evaluated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available