4.7 Article

Effect of maternal obesity on estrous cyclicity, embryo development and blastocyst gene expression in a mouse model

Journal

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Volume 27, Issue 12, Pages 3513-3522

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des327

Keywords

body mass; embryo development; gene expression; menstrual cycle; high-fat diet

Funding

  1. University of Missouri
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. Lalor Foundation
  4. NIH [RC1 ES018195, HD44042, HD21896]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

STUDY QUESTION: Does maternal obesity affect estrous cyclicity, embryo development and blastocyst gene expression in mice? SUMMARY ANSWER: Maternal obesity alters estrous cyclicity and causes the down-regulation of two key metabolite receptors (Slc2a1 and Ldlr) in blastocysts recovered from diet-induced obese females, but embryo development is not affected. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Maternal obesity reduces fertility because of effects in the periconception period, but its negative influence is on estrous cyclicity, oocyte quality or embryo development. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: This was a randomized study based on a mouse model for obesity. Twenty-one outbred NIH Swiss mice were used and obesity was induced by a diet high in fat administered for 12 weeks prior to breeding to control males. MATERIAL, SETTING AND METHODS: Females were fed either a control diet (C, n 9) or a diet high in fat [diet-induced obesity (DiO), n 12] for 12 weeks, and were then co-housed with fertile males. Mice that failed to breed during 20 consecutive days were considered infertile. Control and diet-induced obese females that demonstrated vaginal plugs were euthanized 3.5 days after mating, blood was sampled for glucose and hormone measurements, corpora lutea counted and embryos recovered; the relative mRNA abundance of 11 candidate genes was determined in blastocysts by qPCR. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Five DiO females failed to breed and displayed anovulatory ovaries (DiOI), whereas the other seven DiO females (DiOF) could breed, albeit over an extended period compared with controls. DiOF weighed significantly less than DiOI. Both groups had elevated serum insulin compared with C, although blood glucose level was only significantly higher than that in controls in the infertile DiOI group. Adiponectin was lower in the DiOI and leptin higher in both the DiOI and DiOF mice than in C. DiOF ovulated the same number of oocytes as C, and embryo development to blastocyst was normal. The expression of genes encoding metabolic hormone receptors (Insr, Igf1r, Igf2r, Adipor1, Adipor2 and Lepr) and key metabolic enzymes (Gapdh, Cpt1a and Sod2) did not differ between DiOF and C blastocysts, but that of metabolite receptors (Slc2a1 and Ldr) was down-regulated in DiOF. To limit the role of chance, the experiments were conducted in a defined laboratory setting with the proper controls, and the animals were randomly assigned to each experimental group. Moreover, a P-value of 0.05 was chosen to determine whether the differences observed between the groups were statistically significant. LIMITATIONS AND REASONS FOR CAUTION: The results obtained may not fully extrapolate to humans. Also, as follicular activity was not monitored while breeding, so the extended breeding period for DiOF group might be explained by behavioral abnormalities occurring in normal cycling animals. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: DiO alters the estrous cycle in the mouse model and demonstrates a role of obesity in infertility. The data also suggest that in an outbred, genetically diverse population, such as the human, individual susceptibility to obesity and associated infertility induced by diet exists. The apparently normal development to blastocyst observed in fertile, obese females suggests that preimplantation embryos can resist potentially adverse outcomes caused by an oversupply of fatty acids and glucose under in vivo conditions. This metabolic plasticity may, in part, be due to an ability to down-regulate metabolite transporters, thereby preventing excessive nutrient uptake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available