4.7 Article

Estimating the prevalence of infertility in Canada

Journal

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 738-746

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der465

Keywords

prevalence; infertility; epidemiology; risk factors

Funding

  1. Assisted Human Reproduction Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the past 10 years, there has been a significant increase in the use of assisted reproductive technologies in Canada, however, little is known about the overall prevalence of infertility in the population. The purpose of the present study was to estimate the prevalence of current infertility in Canada according to three definitions of the risk of conception. Data from the infertility component of the 20092010 Canadian Community Health Survey were analyzed for married and common-law couples with a female partner aged 1844. The three definitions of the risk of conception were derived sequentially starting with birth control use in the previous 12 months, adding reported sexual intercourse in the previous 12 months, then pregnancy intent. Prevalence and odds ratios of current infertility were estimated by selected characteristics. Estimates of the prevalence of current infertility ranged from 11.5 (95 CI 10.2, 12.9) to 15.7 (95 CI 14.2, 17.4). Each estimate represented an increase in current infertility prevalence in Canada when compared with previous national estimates. Couples with lower parity (0 or 1 child) had significantly higher odds of experiencing current infertility when the female partner was aged 3544 years versus 1834 years. Lower odds of experiencing current infertility were observed for multiparous couples regardless of age group of the female partner, when compared with nulliparous couples. The present study suggests that the prevalence of current infertility has increased since the last time it was measured in Canada, and is associated with the age of the female partner and parity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available