4.7 Article

Fertility determinants after conservative surgery for mucinous borderline tumours of the ovary (excluding peritoneal pseudomyxoma)

Journal

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 808-814

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq399

Keywords

mucinous borderline ovarian tumours; fertility; conservative surgery; unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; cystectomy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to define determinants of fertility in patients treated conservatively for mucinous borderline ovarian tumours (MBOTs), and to compare outcomes after salpingo-oophorectomy or cystectomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of fertility results in a series of patients treated conservatively for MBOTs and desiring pregnancy. Conservative surgery was defined as preservation of the uterus and ovarian tissue in one or both adnexa(e). Fertility results were compared with patients who had undergone a cystectomy or a (salpingo-)oophorectomy. Only patients with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up were included. Epidemiological, surgical, histological parameters and other prognostic factors for fertility results were investigated. RESULTS: A group of 31 patients who had been treated conservatively between 1997 and 2004 and who desired pregnancy were investigated. Patients were treated by unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO) (n = 19) or cystectomy (n = 12). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was higher in the USO group compared with the cystectomy group (94.7 versus 49.1%, P = 0.041). Among the 31 women, 12 had become pregnant. The 5-year probabilities of pregnancy were comparable between the cystectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy groups (41.8 and 45.9%, respectively, P = 0.66). None of the other factors studied (epidemiological, surgical and histological parameters) were associated with fertility results. CONCLUSIONS: The use of salpingo-oophorectomy rather than cystectomy should be preferred during conservative surgery for patients with MBOTs because it decreases the risk of recurrence and does not impair fertility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available