4.7 Article

Homocysteine metabolism in the pre-ovulatory follicle during ovarian stimulation

Journal

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages 2570-2576

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den292

Keywords

folic acid; cobalamin; pyridoxine; assisted reproduction; follicular fluid

Funding

  1. Divisions of Reproductive Medicine
  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  3. Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Ovarian stimulation gives rise to supraphysiological estradiol levels, which may affect oocyte quality. This study aims to investigate whether ovarian stimulation deranges the homocysteine pathway thereby affecting the pre-ovulatory follicle. METHODS: Blood samples were collected on cycle day 2 and the day of hCG administration in 181 women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF. In each subject, the diameter of the two leading follicles was measured and the corresponding follicular fluids were collected. In blood and follicular fluid samples, total homocysteine (tHcy), folate, cobalamin and pyridoxal'5-phosphate (PLP) were determined. According to the blood folate levels, women were classified as either folic acid supplemented (n = 113) or non-supplemented (n = 32). RESULTS: Ovarian stimulation resulted in a significant decrease in blood tHcy and cobalamin levels (both P <= 0.001). The blood concentrations of tHcy, folate, cobalamin and PLP were significantly correlated with the corresponding follicular fluid concentrations (all P <= 0.001). Follicular fluid tHcy concentrations were inversely correlated with follicular diameter (P <= 0.05). In folic acid supplemented women, follicular fluid folate was inversely correlated with follicular diameter (P <= 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian stimulation deranges blood and follicular fluid biomarkers of the homocysteine pathway. High ovarian follicular fluid tHcy and folate levels may have detrimental effects on follicular development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available