4.1 Article

Excursions out-of-lane versus standard deviation of lateral position as outcome measure of the on-the-road driving test

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hup.2406

Keywords

driving; on-road; impairment; SDLP; excursions out-of-lane

Funding

  1. Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment
  2. Takeda
  3. Red Bull
  4. Aventis
  5. Cephalon
  6. GlaxoSmithKline
  7. Neurocrine
  8. Pfizer
  9. Sanofi
  10. Schering-Plough
  11. Sepracor
  12. Somaxon
  13. Syrex
  14. TransOral
  15. Wyeth
  16. Xenoport

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The traditional outcome measure of the Dutch on-the-road driving test is the standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP), the weaving of the car. This paper explores whether excursions out-of-lane are a suitable additional outcome measure to index driving impairment. Methods A literature search was conducted to search for driving tests that used both SDLP and excursions out-of-lane as outcome measures. The analyses were limited to studies examining hypnotic drugs because several of these drugs have been shown to produce next-morning sedation. Results Standard deviation of lateral position was more sensitive in demonstrating driving impairment. In fact, solely relying on excursions out-of-lane as outcome measure incorrectly classifies approximately half of impaired drives as unimpaired. The frequency of excursions out-of-lane is determined by the mean lateral position within the right traffic lane. Defining driving impairment as having a Delta SDLP>2.4 cm, half of the impaired driving tests (51.2%, 43/84) failed to produce excursions out-of-lane. Alternatively, 20.9% of driving tests with Delta SDLP<2.4 cm (27/129) had at least one excursion out-of-lane. Conclusions Excursions out-of-lane are neither a suitable measure to demonstrate driving impairment nor is this measure sufficiently sensitive to differentiate adequately between differences in magnitude of driving impairment. Copyright (C) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available