4.5 Article

Seeing the Wood for the Trees: A Minimal Reference Phylogeny for the Human Y Chromosome

Journal

HUMAN MUTATION
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 187-191

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.22468

Keywords

Y chromosome; Y-SNP; human evolution; phylogeny; haplogroup; patrilineal ancestry; genealogy

Funding

  1. Netherlands Genomic Initiative (NGI)/Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)
  2. Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen)
  3. KU Leuven BOF-Centre of Excellence [PF/2010/07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the last few decades, a wealth of studies dedicated to the human Y chromosome and its DNA variation, in particular Y-chromosome single-nucleotide polymorphisms (Y-SNPs), has led to the construction of a well-established Y-chromosome phylogeny. Since the recent advent of new sequencing technologies, the discovery of additional Y-SNPs is exploding and their continuous incorporation in the phylogenetic tree is leading to an ever higher resolution. However, the large and increasing amount of information included in the complete Y-chromosome phylogeny, which now already includes many thousands of identified Y-SNPs, can be overwhelming and complicates its understanding as well as the task of selecting suitable markers for genotyping purposes in evolutionary, demographic, anthropological, genealogical, medical, and forensic studies. As a solution, we introduce a concise reference phylogeny whereby we do not aim to provide an exhaustive tree that includes all known Y-SNPs but, rather, a quite stable reference tree aiming for optimal global discrimination capacity based on a strongly reduced set that includes only the most resolving Y-SNPs. Furthermore, with this reference tree, we wish to propose a common standard for Y-marker as well as Y-haplogroup nomenclature. The current version of our tree is based on a core set of 417 branch-defining Y-SNPs and is available online at http://www.phylotree.org/Y. (C) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available