4.5 Article

Novel NOBOX Loss-of-Function Mutations Account for 6.2% of Cases in a Large Primary Ovarian Insufficiency Cohort

Journal

HUMAN MUTATION
Volume 32, Issue 10, Pages 1108-1113

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/humu.21543

Keywords

nonsyndromic; primary ovarian insufficiency; NOBOX; ovary

Funding

  1. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (Inserm)
  2. Institut National de la Sante de la Recherche Medicale-Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) is a disorder associated with female infertility, which affects approximately 1% of women under 40 years of age. A genetic component has been suggested as one possible cause of the majority of cases of nonsyndromic forms. Newborn Ovary Homeobox (NOBOX) is an ovary-specific gene, playing a critical role in ovary in mice, as its absence leads to sterility mimicking a POI. In this study, we sequenced NOBOX in a cohort of 178 women with idiopathic POI. Among 19 identified variations, we described one nonsense (c.907C>T/p.R303X) and four missense (c.271G>T/p.G91W, c.349C>T/p.R117W, c.1025G>C/p.S342T, and c.1048G>T/p.V350L) NOBOX heterozygous mutations in 12 patients. We reproduced each of the five mutations and tested their effects on the signaling activity in transfected cells. We demonstrated that these mutations compromised the ability of the proteins to bind to and transactivate the well-known growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9) promoter. The pattern of our findings suggests that the genetic mechanism in humans responsible for POI in women involves haploinsufficiency rather than dominant negative gene action. The identification, characterization, and the very high 6.2% prevalence of these new mutations in POI patients suggest considering NOBOX as the first autosomal candidate gene involved in this syndrome. HumMutat 32:1108-1113, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available