4.5 Article

SNP Discovery Performance of Two Second-Generation Sequencing Platforms in the NOD2 Gene Region

Journal

HUMAN MUTATION
Volume 31, Issue 7, Pages 875-885

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.21276

Keywords

second-generation sequencing; SOLiD; 454/FLX; NOD2; rare variants; benchmarking; coverage simulation; SNP discovery

Funding

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through the National Genome Research Network (NGFN)
  2. popgen biobank
  3. European Community [FP7/2007-2013, HEALTH-F4-2008-201418]
  4. Norwegian PSC research center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A potentially important application of second generation sequencing technologies is to identify disease-associated variation. For comparison of the performance in SNP detection, the Crohn's disease (CD)-associated NOD2 gene was subjected to targeted resequencing using two different second-generation sequencing technologies. Eleven CD patients were selected based on their haplotype background at the NOD2 locus. The 40-kb large NOD2 gene region was amplified using long-range PCR (LR-PCR), and sequenced with the Roche 454/FLX system, an Applied Biosystems SOLiD mate-pair library (2 x 25 bp), and a SOLiD fragment (50 bp) library. The entire NOD2 region was also sequenced using conventional Sanger technology. Four-hundred forty-two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were discovered with the SOLiD mate-pair library, 454 with the fragment library, and 441 with the 454/FLX. For the homozygous SNPs, 98% were confirmed by Sanger for the mate-pair library, 100% for the fragment library and 99% for the 454/FLX. Ninety-six percent of the heterozygous SNPs detected with the SOLiD mate-pair library, 91% with the fragment library and 96% with the 454/FLX were confirmed by Sanger. In a simulation, the SNP detection performance fell rapidly when the achieved coverage was below 40 x. Due to uneven representation of the target region when using LR-PCR, oversequencing of other regions is necessary. Hum Mutat 31:875-885, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available