4.5 Article

Segregation of mtDNA Throughout Human Embryofetal Development: m.3243A > G as a Model System

Journal

HUMAN MUTATION
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 116-125

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.21417

Keywords

mitochondria; mitochondrial DNA; MELAS; NARP; respiratory chain deficiency; embryo; preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Funding

  1. l'Association Francaise contre les Myopathies (AFM)
  2. l'Agence de Biomedecine, l'INSERM
  3. European network Mitocircle
  4. l'AFM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations cause a wide range of serious diseases with high transmission risk and maternal inheritance. Tissue heterogeneity of the heteroplasmy rate (mutant load) accounts for the wide phenotypic spectrum observed in carriers. Owing to the absence of therapy, couples at risk to transmit such disorders commonly ask for prenatal (PND) or preimplantation diagnosis (PGD). The lack of data regarding heteroplasmy distribution throughout intrauterine development, however, hampers the implementation of such procedures. We tracked the segregation of the m.3243A>G mutation (MT-TL1 gene) responsible for the MELAS syndrome in the developing embryo/fetus, using tissues and cells from eight carrier females, their 38 embryos and 12 fetuses. Mutant mtDNA segregation was found to be governed by random genetic drift, during oogenesis and somatic tissue development. The size of the bottleneck operating for m.3243A>G during oogenesis was shown to be individual-dependent. Comparison with data we achieved for the m.8993T>G mutation (MT-ATP6 gene), responsible for the NARP/Leigh syndrome, indicates that these mutations differentially influence mtDNA segregation during oogenesis, while their impact is similar in developing somatic tissues. These data have major consequences for PND and PGD procedures in mtDNA inherited disorders. Hum Mutat 32:116-125, 2011. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available