4.5 Article

HaploGrep: A Fast and Reliable Algorithm for Automatic Classification of Mitochondrial DNA Haplogroups

Journal

HUMAN MUTATION
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 25-32

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.21382

Keywords

mitochondrial DNA; haplogroup; Phylotree; quality assurance

Funding

  1. Osterreichische Nationalbank [13059]
  2. GEN-AU
  3. University of Innsbruck (Doktoratsstipendium aus der Nachwuchsforderung) [MIP10/2009/3]
  4. Autonomous Province of Bozen/Bolzano-South Tyrol

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An ongoing source of controversy in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) research is based on the detection of numerous errors in mtDNA profiles that led to erroneous conclusions and false disease associations. Most of these controversies could be avoided if the samples' haplogroup status would be taken into consideration. Knowing the mtDNA haplogroup affiliation is a critical prerequisite for studying mechanisms of human evolution and discovering genes involved in complex diseases, and validating phylogenetic consistency using haplogroup classification is an important step in quality control. However, despite the availability of Phylotree, a regularly updated classification tree of global mtDNA variation, the process of haplogroup classification is still time-consuming and error-prone, as researchers have to manually compare the polymorphisms found in a population sample to those summarized in Phylotree, polymorphism by polymorphism, sample by sample. We present HaploGrep, a fast, reliable and straight-forward algorithm implemented in a Web application to determine the haplogroup affiliation of thousands of mtDNA profiles genotyped for the entire mtDNA or any part of it. HaploGrep uses the latest version of Phylotree and offers an all-in-one solution for quality assessment of mtDNA profiles in clinical genetics, population genetics and forensics. HaploGrep can be accessed freely at http://haplogrep.uibk.ac.at. Hum Mutat 32:25-32, 2011. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available