4.5 Article

Ancestry Informative Marker Sets for Determining Continental Origin and Admixture Proportions in Common Populations in America

Journal

HUMAN MUTATION
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 69-78

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.20822

Keywords

population structure; continental ancestry; population stratification; ancestry informative markers

Funding

  1. Applied Biosystems
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. Christine Landgraf Memorial Research Fund (LMB)
  4. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [AR050267, DK071185, P30 CA093373]
  5. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA093373] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R01AR050267] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK071185] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To provide a resource for assessing continental ancestry in a wide variety of genetic studies, we identified, validated, and characterized a set of 128 ancestry informative markers (AIMs). The markers were chosen for informativeness, genome,wide distribution, and genotype reproducibility on two platforms (TaqMan(R) assays and Illumina arrays). We analyzed genotyping data from 825 subjects with diverse ancestry, including European, East Asian, Amerindian, African, South Asian, Mexican, and Puerto Rican. A comprehensive set of 128 AIMs and subsets as small as 24 AIMs are shown to be useful tools for ascertaining the origin of subjects from particular continents, anti to correct for population stratification in admixed population sample sets. Our findings provide general guidelines for the application of specific AIM subsets as a resource for wide application. We conclude that investigators can use TaqMan assays for the selected AIMs as a simple and cost efficient tool to control for differences in continental ancestry when conducting association studies in ethnically diverse populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available