4.2 Article

Interpersonal coordination and ball dynamics in futsal (indoor football)

Journal

HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 1245-1259

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2011.04.003

Keywords

Coordination dynamics; Futsal; Game constraints; Playing dyads; Team sports

Funding

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [SFRH/BD/36225/2007]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/36225/2007] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here, we report an investigation of the patterned movement behavior of players for a specific sub-phase of the game of futsal, namely when the goalkeeper for the attacking team is substituted with an extra outfield player. The movement trajectories of the ball and players were recorded in both lateral and longitudinal directions and investigated using relative phase analysis. Some differences in phase relations between different playing dyads were noted, indicating specificity of phase attractions, or otherwise, for certain players. In general terms, the defenders demonstrated strong in-phase attractions with the ball and with each other, whereas weaker phase attractions, indicated by increased relative phase variability, were observed for the attackers and ball, as well as between attackers themselves. These results demonstrate different coordination dynamics for the defending and attacking dyads, from which we interpret evidence for different playing sub-systems consistent with different team objectives linked together in an overarching game structure. In keeping with dynamical systems theory for complex systems, we view this sub-phase of futsal as being characterized by coordinated behavior patterns that emerge as a result of self-organizing processes. These dynamic patterns are generated within functional constraints, with players and teams exerting mutual influence on each other. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available