4.2 Article

Self-controlled concurrent feedback and the education of attention towards perceptual invariants

Journal

HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 450-467

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2008.12.004

Keywords

Perceptual-motor learning; Self-controlled feedback; Concurrent learning; Direct perception; Education of attention; Calibration

Funding

  1. Delegation Genrale pour l'Armement (DGA)
  2. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science [HUM2006-11603-C02-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study investigates the effects of different types of concurrent feedback on the acquisition of perceptual-motor skills. Twenty participants walked through virtual corridors in which rhythmically opening and closing sliding doors were placed. The participants aimed to adjust their walking speed so as to cross the doors when the doors were close to their maximal aperture width. The highest level of performance was achieved by learners who practiced the task with unambiguous self-controlled concurrent feedback, which is to say, by learners who could request that feedback at wish. Practice with imposed rather than self-controlled feedback and practice without concurrent feedback were shown to be less effective. Finally, the way in which the self-controlled concurrent feedback was presented was also found to be of paramount importance; if the feedback is ambiguous, it may even prevent participants from learning the task. Clearly, unambiguous self-controlled feedback can give rise to higher levels of performance than other feedback conditions (compared to imposed schedule) but, depending on the way it is presented, the feedback can also prevent the participants from learning the task. In the discussion it is argued that unambiguous self-controlled concurrent feedback allows learners to more rapidly educate their attention towards more useful perceptual invariants and to calibrate the relation between perceptual invariants and action parameters. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available