4.5 Article

Chromosome fragility and the abnormal replication of the FMR1 locus in fragile X syndrome

Journal

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages 2940-2952

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddu006

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health
  2. Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health
  3. Russian Foundation for Basic Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) is a learning disability seen in individuals who have > 200 CGGaEuro cent CCG repeats in the 5' untranslated region of the X-linked FMR1 gene. Such alleles are associated with a fragile site, FRAXA, a gap or constriction in the chromosome that is coincident with the repeat and is induced by folate stress or thymidylate synthase inhibitors like fluorodeoxyuridine (FdU). The molecular basis of the chromosome fragility is unknown. Previous work has suggested that the stable intrastrand structures formed by the repeat may be responsible, perhaps via their ability to block DNA synthesis. We have examined the replication dynamics of normal and FXS cells with and without FdU. We show here that an intrinsic problem with DNA replication exists in the FMR1 gene of individuals with FXS even in the absence of FdU. Our data suggest a model for chromosome fragility in FXS in which the repeat impairs replication from an origin of replication (ORI) immediately adjacent to the repeat. The fact that the replication problem occurs even in the absence of FdU suggests that this phenomenon may have in vivo consequences, including perhaps accounting for the loss of the X chromosome containing the fragile site that causes Turner syndrome (45, X0) in female carriers of such alleles. Our data on FRAXA may also be germane for the other FdU-inducible fragile sites in humans, that we show here share many common features with FRAXA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available