4.5 Article

The DNA translocase activity of FANCM protects stalled replication forks

Journal

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages 2005-2016

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/dds013

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Association for International Cancer Research
  2. Polish State Committee for Scientific Research [N301 165935]
  3. European Science Foundation
  4. Union for International Cancer Control American Cancer Society
  5. Fanconi Anaemia Research Fund
  6. Cancer Research UK
  7. MRC [G0902418] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Cancer Research UK [11582] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Medical Research Council [G0902418] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Worldwide Cancer Research [07-0922] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

FANCM is the most highly conserved protein within the Fanconi anaemia (FA) tumour suppressor pathway. However, although FANCM contains a helicase domain with translocase activity, this is not required for its role in activating the FA pathway. Instead, we show here that FANCM translocaseactivity is essential for promoting replication fork stability. We demonstrate that cells expressing translocase-defective FANCM show altered global replication dynamics due to increased accumulation of stalled forks that subsequently degenerate into DNA double-strand breaks, leading to ATM activation, CTBP-interacting protein (CTIP)-dependent end resection and homologous recombination repair. Accordingly, abrogation of ATM or CTIP function in FANCM-deficient cells results in decreased cell survival. We also found that FANCM translocase activity protects cells from accumulating 53BP1-OPT domains, which mark lesions resulting from problems arising during replication. Taken together, these data show that FANCM plays an essential role in maintaining chromosomal integrity by promoting the recovery of stalled replication forks and hence preventing tumourigenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available